Find something wrong in this description?  Help us fix it! 
Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn

Why does PolySpace 5.1.1 (R2008a) show a red non-terminating loop (NTL) check in my code?

Kilmer BlackDove BlackDove Kilmer II UGG UGG UGG Kilmer II 7xqAOSxn

Asked by MathWorks Support Team
on 27 Jun 2009

My C code looks as follows. When I run a PolySpace verification, the "for" keyword that is mentioned in the comments is marked red with a message that the loop never terminates. Also, I get another red check for a underflow error. I am using the option "-detect-unsigned-overflows".

int main () {
    int intC;
    unsigned int uintA, uintB, i = 0;
    uintA = 20;
    uintB = 30;
    intC = 10;
    // The following keyword "for" is marked with
    // a red NTL check.
    for(i; i < 10; i++) {
      // Subtraction marked with a red UNFL check
      // for a possible underflow.
      if ((uintA - uintB) < uintC) { // UNFL: 20 - 30
        //...
      }
    }
}

Tags

No tags entered yet.

Kilmer UGG BlackDove BlackDove UGG UGG Kilmer II Kilmer II
Dansko Nubuck Tumbled UpBrown Steffi Pull UpRed Pull Tumbled Black Milled RrHTR7wqW4

1 Answer

Answer by MathWorks Support Team UGG Kilmer UGG II Kilmer UGG BlackDove II BlackDove Kilmer on 27 Jun 2009
  Accepted Answer

The red NTL check is caused by the red underflow check (UNFL) within the loop. Correcting the code that causes the UNFL check or removing the option "-detect-unsigned-overflows" will cause the NTL check to disappear.

  0 Comments

Sign in to comment.